<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mankiw-Krugman Wager Over Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apostlesandmarkets.com/2009/03/11/mankiw-krugman-wager-over-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apostlesandmarkets.com/2009/03/11/mankiw-krugman-wager-over-growth/</link>
	<description>Christianity and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:42:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen J. Haessler</title>
		<link>http://www.apostlesandmarkets.com/2009/03/11/mankiw-krugman-wager-over-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Haessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostlesandmarkets.com/?p=940#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Good point. And revised estimates usually get closer to accuracy. Political axes, though, tend to distort projections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. And revised estimates usually get closer to accuracy. Political axes, though, tend to distort projections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: multiplier effect tourism</title>
		<link>http://www.apostlesandmarkets.com/2009/03/11/mankiw-krugman-wager-over-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>multiplier effect tourism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostlesandmarkets.com/?p=940#comment-511</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree that the growth rates are overly optimistic.  I never understood why numbers of that nature aren&#039;t slightly played down to start with... It&#039;s always better in the public eye to exceed a low balled goal (as long as it&#039;s not obviously low balled) than to fail to meet a higher goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree that the growth rates are overly optimistic.  I never understood why numbers of that nature aren&#8217;t slightly played down to start with&#8230; It&#8217;s always better in the public eye to exceed a low balled goal (as long as it&#8217;s not obviously low balled) than to fail to meet a higher goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
