Click each cover for more info and a short review.
Thomas Sowell
The Housing Boom and Bust
I’m only on page 15 but this is an awesome book. It is the clearest explanation of the proximite cause of the current recession I’ve seen so far. One of the most important things I’ve learned is housing prices in California, the hottest real estate market leading up to the housing bust, was driven largely by political restrictions on land use. In San Mateo County for example, half of the land was designated off limits for housing. This artificial, political land shortage drove up the prices of even modest homes to mansion-like levels. Must continue reading.
Mark R. Levin
Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto
This is a good book. I especially like how Mr. Levin ties opposition to growing statism to our founding principles and documents. I was shocked by the description of Mass v. EPA (2007) that declared carbon dioxide a poison to be regulated. Absurd. Statism has imposed unfunded ponze schemes like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
The weakest chapter was chapter 9 on immigration. I counted 11 paragraphs in this chapter that dealt with the economics of immigration, none of which mentioned the fact of positive net benefits overall of immigration. I posted on this issue on 25 May 2009.
Despite one weak chapter, the book is a must read for anyone interested in an intelligent defense of freedom and prosperity.
Gregory Clark
A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World (Princeton Economic History of the Western
One of the most astounding claims in this fascinating book (though I’m still not convinced the industrial revolution’s take-off is explained by the survival of the richest) is the admission that a key, maybe the key insight in economics is based on faith and reason. Hmmmm…. You see the importance of faith?
The context of the claim is Clark’s description of Robert Solow’s model of growth as based on a simple equation involving four variables: labor, capital, land, and innovation. This last factor plays a decisive role. And yet:
“Note, however, that when we arrive at this final truth as to the nature of modern growth we have lost all ability to empirically test its truth. It is a statement of reason and faith, not an empirical proposition. Physical capital can be measured, as can the share of capital income in all income in the economy. But the generalized spillovers from innovation activities are not in practice measurable.” (p. 204)
I think this insight makes the dismal science much more interesting because now vulgar materialists and simplistic empiricists might actually have to believe in entrepreneurs without knowing exactly how much they contribute! “…we know they’re important; just not how important…”
Russell Roberts
The Invisible Heart: An Economic Romance
This is a wonderful novelized principles textbook. Basic economic concepts are revealed through the dialogues between a high school economics teacher and his English teacher fiancee. When I taught high school economics at Marquette and my wife taught English, I was amazed how closely art resembled life, or was it the other way around?
Barbara Frale
The Templars: The Secret History Revealed
This is a great book. I have a mini-library on the Knights Templar and this is the best of the bunch. Barbara Frahle discovered the Chinon Parchment or trial transcripts of the Templar leadership from the early 1300’s. What I learned from her narrative was that Pope Clement V was not quite the scoundrel as other authors have made him out to be. In fact, he cleared the Templar of heresy, though did find that some of their initiation rites were out of line. In any case, he does not come off like Philip IV who positively salivated at the prospect of expropriating Templar wealth and was willing to use any excuse to enrich himself. May he reflect on all this during his time in Purgatory.
I also learned that the Papacy’s long, long struggle for independence from the monarchical governments of Europe created space within which detailed understandings of human freedom grew. In fact, the divine right of kings may be connected to Philip the (Un)Fair, who made a claim dating back to Clovis that the crowned princes, not the Popes of Rome, had responsibility for protecting the Church on earth. Ominous, most ominous.
Amity Shlaes
The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression
The quote from William Graham Sumner’s lecture explains the title of this first rate history of the New Deal:
‘As soon as A observes something which seems to him to be wrong, from which X is suffering, A talks it over with B, and A and B then propose to get a law passed to remedy the evil and help X. Their law always proposes to determine … what A, B, and C shall do for X.’ But what about C? There was nothing wrong with A and B helping X. What was wrong was the law, and the indenturing of C to the cause. C was the forgotten man, the man who paid, ‘the man who never is thought of.’ (p. 12)
Thomas Sowell
Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One
My favorite part is Dr. Sowell’s exchange with his teacher, Arthur Smithies of Harvard. Sowell explained his strong feelings in class for a given policy proposal. Dr. Smithies asked, “And then what will happen?” (p. 4) Smithies kept asking this question after each answer, illustrating a key skill of economic analysis in going beyond first stage thinking to consider costs. benefits, and unintended consequences of well-meaning policies like affordable housing, anti-discrimination, or income equalization policies. This is the principle of considering secondary effects.
David Schmidtz
Person, Polis, Planet: Essays in Applied Philosophy
Here is a wonderful quote from p. 176 quote: “In turn, citizens internalize responsibility when they face the world of tangled joint causation as it is, and do not rely on courts to save them from themselves.” Amen. No thanks, Nanny State. Give me personal responsibilty.
Diana Wood
Medieval Economic Thought (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks)
Chapters 7 and 8 contain illuminating dicussion of usury. This from p. 205: “Leo X [1515] canonized the attitude that ‘Usury and trewe interest be thinges as contrary as falshed is to trewth,’ in effect, admitting that the Church had come to terms with economic practice …. Paradoxically it was the Protestants, with their biblically based faith, who kept the usuary debate alive by returning to the traditional scholastic attitudes.”
And this from p. 204: “[Pope Leo X] had undermined most of the foundations of the usury doctrine. By accepting the charging of interest by the montes from the beginning of a loan he had denied that loans were free, and also, by implication, suggested that time could be sold. By suggesting that a profit could be made, provided that it involved labor, cost, or risk, he was sanctioning the main extrinsic titles to interest, and so hinting that barren money could be made fruitful by the application of any of these three.”
And of course, a fascinating few pages on ‘clerical usury’ and papal lending practices and the understandings thereof, beginning on p. 171.
For me, the question behind the post is what inference the writer wants the reader to draw from the information. I get the impression you are suggesting that perceived disparities in the salaries of minority Ph.D’s stem from the generally inferior quality of minority Ph.D’s credentials as opposed to race. However, the question I find equally intriguing is why minority Ph.D’s generally underperform in terms of credentials when compared with other faculty members. I’d look out for an underlying argument in this post that appears to venture into the Bell Curve theory. Either this is just the natural order of things and we should be resigned to the achievement gap or this is a symptom of a flaw in our education system that is systematically punishing minority students for being a minority. If the former, then wage disparities are not problematic and possibly helpful. If the latter, then we should all take the problem of wage disparities very seriously.